Santa Monica Properties v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*743Opinion
BIGELOW, P. J.
After taking more than a year to issue a final decision, the Santa Monica Rent Control Board (RCB) decreased two tenants’ rents because their landlord, Santa Monica Properties (SMP), lowered the temperature on a hot tub during workday hours, heating it only during evening hours, and altered a sauna’s timer knob so that the sauna heated for one-half hour at a turn instead of the previous one hour. SMP filed a petition for writ of administrative mandate challenging the rent decrease decision. In the same pleading, SMP sought a petition for writ of traditional mandate to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Woods v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Edwards v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Palagin v. Paniagua Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Marriage of Vidales CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Palagin v. Paniagua ConstructionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014