Legal Opinion

Santa Monica Properties v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 2012No. B227868PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*743Opinion

BIGELOW, P. J.

After taking more than a year to issue a final decision, the Santa Monica Rent Control Board (RCB) decreased two tenants’ rents because their landlord, Santa Monica Properties (SMP), lowered the temperature on a hot tub during workday hours, heating it only during evening hours, and altered a sauna’s timer knob so that the sauna heated for one-half hour at a turn instead of the previous one hour. SMP filed a petition for writ of administrative mandate challenging the rent decrease decision. In the same pleading, SMP sought a petition for writ of traditional mandate to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Woods v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Edwards v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Palagin v. Paniagua Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Marriage of Vidales CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Palagin v. Paniagua ConstructionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API