Legal Opinion

McLendon v. Boyles Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1923No. 6 Div. 41PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The question in this case is that of consent of the city commissioners of Birmingham to traverse and use the streets of that city in the operation of the “private enterprise” shown by pleadings and proof, without first obtaining the consent of the proper authorities of the city within the provisions of section 220 of the Constitution 1901, as construed by this court. City of Montgomery v. Orpheum Taxi Co., 203 Ala. 103, 82 South. 117; Ex parte Ashworth, 204 Ala. 391, 86 South. 84; Harris v. Barrett, 206 Ala. 263, 89 South. 717; Giglio v. Barrett, 207 Ala. 278, 283, 92 South. 668; Cloe, Com’r…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Montgomery v. Orpheum Taxi Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  2. Birmingham Interurban Taxicab Service Corp. v. McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Giglio v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Cloe v. State Ex Rel. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Harris v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. City of Birmingham v. Hood-Mcpherson Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. City of Decatur v. MeadorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. City of Mobile v. FarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Crabtree v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API