Legal Opinion

Giglio v. Barrett

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 6, 1922No. 6 Div. 535PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The case was submitted on appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant filed a motion to substitute the commissioners of the city (in office on the date when the motion was made) in the place of original respondents (in office when the bill was filed). Submission was also “on its merits.”

In the caption of the original bill praying injunction, N. A. Barrett and otners named are styled respondents,“as commissioners of the city of Birmingham, Ala.” The averment in the first paragraph is that said parties “are commissioners of the city of Birmingham, Ala., * * * and are residents citizens…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Van Hook v. City of SelmaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Board of Commissioners v. Orr.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Wells v. American Mortgage Co. of Scotland, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Denson v. Alabama Fuel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. DawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Birmingham Interurban Taxicab Service Corp. v. McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. City of Mobile v. FarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Ex Parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API