Legal Opinion
Birmingham Interurban Taxicab Service Corp. v. McLendon
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 22, 1923No. 6 Div. 46PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
Const. Ala. 1901, § 220, reads:
“No person, firm, association or corporation shall be authorized or permitted to use the streets, avenues, alleys or public places of any city, town, or village for the construction or operation of any public utility or private enterprise, without first obtaining the consent of the proper authorities of such city, town or village.”
This section was construed in City of Montgomery v. Orpheum Taxi Co., 203 Ala. 103, 82 South. 117.
We there held that its terms, “contemplated the permanent preservation of the municipal right to control, by withholding consent, the use…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown v. Mayor of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
- City of Montgomery v. Orpheum Taxi Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Pilcher v. City of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Giglio v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Cloe v. State Ex Rel. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lillie Boman v. Birmingham Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- City of Birmingham v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- City of Decatur v. MeadorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- City of Mobile v. FarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Crabtree v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.