Legal Opinion
City of Birmingham v. Hood-Mcpherson Realty Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 14, 1937No. 6 Div. 43PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The suit was for injunction to abate a nuisance resulting in personal injury to abutting property owners.
It is averred in the bill as amended that the realty company is the owner and that the furniture company is the. tenant of the property located on Fourth Avenue North, in the City of Birmingham; that the block of Fourth Avenue North, on which said property is located, is included in the parking meter zone created by the ordinance exhibited and challenged as illegal; that respondent meter company has inserted a series of metal posts in the sidewalks in front of this…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Butchers' Union Slaughter-House & Live-Stock Landing Co. v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Nebraska Ex Rel. OmahaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. MathewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Breinig v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Town of Blowing Rock v. GregorieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Ex Parte DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Harper v. City of Wichita FallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.