Legal Opinion
City of Mobile v. Farrell
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 20, 1934No. 1 Div. 842PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
We have heretofore had this case on appeal, in which the equity of the bill was upheld. Ante, p. 294, 156 So. 635.
The respondents filed answers. Complainant moved for a temporary injunction. That motion was heard on notice and proof as authorized by sections 8304, 8305, Code. The court denied the motion, and complainant appealed as ¿uthorized by section 8307, Code.
There is now no serious effort by appellees to impeach the holding on former appeal, but they contend that their answer and proofs show that though the taxicab ordinance referred to may not on its face show that it…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lillie Boman v. Birmingham Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Harper v. City of Wichita FallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- City of Birmingham v. Hood-Mcpherson Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- City of Decatur v. MeadorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Pritchett v. WadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.