Legal Opinion

Rafter v. Raymark Industries, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1993No. 02873 PHL 92, 03169 PHL 92PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is a consolidated appeal from the July 28 and August 21, 1992 orders denying appellant’s, Keene Corporation, motions for judgment n.o.v., new trial and/or remittitur and affirming the jury verdicts in favor of appellees, Rose Ann Rafter (deceased) and Alice Tuzi (deceased), and awarding appellees delay damages. Appellant presents the following questions for our review:

1. Did the lower court err in ruling on certain objections regarding expert medical .testimony which rulings were prejudicial to Keene Corporation?

2. Did the lower court err on charging the jury on the issue…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dudley v. USX Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Primavera v. Celotex Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Kemp v. QuallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Taylor v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Butler v. KIWI, SASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Neal v. Bavarian Motors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Collins v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Randt v. Abex Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Woodard v. ChatterjeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API