Rafter v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This is a consolidated appeal from the July 28 and August 21, 1992 orders denying appellant’s, Keene Corporation, motions for judgment n.o.v., new trial and/or remittitur and affirming the jury verdicts in favor of appellees, Rose Ann Rafter (deceased) and Alice Tuzi (deceased), and awarding appellees delay damages. Appellant presents the following questions for our review:
1. Did the lower court err in ruling on certain objections regarding expert medical .testimony which rulings were prejudicial to Keene Corporation?
2. Did the lower court err on charging the jury on the issue…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dudley v. USX Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Primavera v. Celotex Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Kemp v. QuallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Taylor v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Butler v. KIWI, SASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Neal v. Bavarian Motors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Collins v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Randt v. Abex Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Woodard v. ChatterjeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.