Legal Opinion
Randt v. Abex Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 19, 1996No. 2222PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the lower court denying appellants’ motions for new trial. 2 We affirm.
The lower court aptly stated the facts and procedural history of the case:
The above-captioned cases were tried in a consolidated action with five other cases in a reverse bifurcated trial. Trial commenced before this Court and a jury on April 5, 1993. Plaintiffs presented their cases and rested on April 12, 1993. Immediately thereafter, defendants moved for nonsuit in each case, based on plaintiffs’ failure to satisfy Eckenrod v. GAF Corporation, 375 Pa.Super. 187, 544 A.2d…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Martin v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Johnson v. Hyundai Motor AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Brinich v. JenckaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Neal v. Bavarian Motors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Croydon Plastics Co. v. Lower Bucks Cooling & HeatingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.