Legal Opinion

Neal v. Bavarian Motors, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 2, 2005PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, P.J.E.:

¶ 1 These consolidated appeals have been brought from the judgment that was entered in favor of Jennifer Neal (plaintiff below), in her action against appellants that was founded upon the sale to her of a stolen car under the guise of a legitimate business transaction. Appellants at Appeal No. 2438 EDA 2004 are MFN Financial Corporation, Mercury Finance Company, LLC, and Consumer Portfolio Services (hereinafter referred to as “Mercury”). Appellant at Appeal No. 2439 EDA 2004 is Bavarian Motors, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Bavarian Motors”). We affirm in part and reverse…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mitzelfelt v. KamrinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Lasprogata v. QuallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Skurnowicz v. LucciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Gunn v. GrossmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Pirozzi v. Penske Olds-Cadillac-GMC, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Boehm, R. v. Riversource Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. James Corp. v. North Allegheny School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Pennsylvania Employee, Benefit Trust Fund v. Zeneca, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
  4. Krishnan v. Cutler Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Richards v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API