Legal Opinion
Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Board of Tax Review
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 27, 1993No. 11144PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether in a tax appeal pursuant to General Statutes § 12-117a1 the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff named the “Board of Tax Review, Town of Bloomfield” as the defendant in the citation and served process on the chairperson of the board of tax review instead of on the town clerk. The trial court found that it did not have subject matter *157jurisdiction and dismissed the appeal. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
The plaintiff, Southern New England Telephone Company, brought this tax appeal pursuant to General Statutes §…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Demar v. Open Space & Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Brunswick v. Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax ReviewConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Almquist v. Madison Board of Tax Review, No. Cv91 0318490 (May 4, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Barancik v. Town of Greenwich, No. Cv94 0139415 S (Apr. 4, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Birkmanis v. Town of Chaplin, No. 063247 (Sep. 25, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
- C. G. Associates v. Town of Greenwich, No. Cv94 0139505 S (Apr. 4, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.