Pryor v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOPPER, J.
This case requires the interpretation of a standard fire insurance policy with extended coverage for vandalism and malicious mischief. The issue raised by the agreed statement of facts appears to be one of first impression in California.
Appellants were owners of three parcels of real estate in Madera County upon which they planned to build three houses for profit. On August 22, 1973, appellants purchased insurance policies covering each of the parcels and the buildings to be constructed on them. Each policy was a standard course of construction policy covering fire,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. v. TrautweinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
- Unkelsbee v. Homestead Fire Insurance Co. of BaltimoreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bimco Iron & Metal Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
3Cited by6 opinions
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. NeislerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Rios v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Sterling v. Audubon Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Mercedes Zee Corp. v. Seneca Ins.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. ArdizoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.