Legal Opinion

Sterling v. Audubon Insurance Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1984No. 83-694PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOKER, Judge.

Plaintiff homeowners seek to recover for alleged insured losses to a house owned by them under a vandalism and malicious mischief endorsement to a homeowner’s policy. Some of the loss consists of appliances or equipment attached to the house which were taken from the house and which have not been found. The basic policy provides no coverage for theft of items from the insured premises. ' The primary issue in this case is whether the detachment and removal of items from the house structure is a covered loss under the vandalism and malicious mischief endorsement of the insurance…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bimco Iron & Metal Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. v. TrautweinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  3. Unkelsbee v. Homestead Fire Insurance Co. of BaltimoreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Lanza Enterprises, Inc. v. Continental Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Theo v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haas v. Audubon Indem. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. ArdizoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Sharplin v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Sterling v. Audubon Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API