Legal Opinion
Rios v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 1, 2004No. B163709PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, P. J.
Plaintiff, Araceil Rios doing business as Joyería Latina Americana (Rios), obtained an insurance policy for her jewelry store that she thought covered her for theft. Rios requested such coverage, but the policy actually issued did not include coverage for theft. Thereafter, Rios’s store was burglarized, and defendants, Scottsdale Insurance Company (Scottsdale) and UCA General Insurance Services (UCA), rejected her insurance claim for theft of the jewelry.
Rios sued, inter alia, Scottsdale (the insurer), UCA (the surplus lines broker through whom the coverage was placed), and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Fox v. PollackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Schultz v. HarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Desai v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Chicago Title Insurance v. AMZ Insurance Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Dollinger Deanza Associates v. Chicago Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Clarendon National Insurance v. Insurance Co. of the WestDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
- American Way Cellular, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Business to Business Markets, Inc. v. Zurich Specialties London Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.