Legal Opinion
Auto-Owners Insurance v. Neisler
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 30, 2015No. A15A0926PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dillard, Judge.
Auto-Owners Insurance Company (“Auto-Owners”) appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment and grant of summary judgment to Jason Neisler on his complaint to recover funds under a dwelling policy that he holds with Auto-Owners. Auto-Owners contends that the trial court erred in (1) ruling that Neisler’s policy covered his claim for certain alleged property damage and loss of rents, and (2) refusing to hold that Neisler’s claim for bad-faith penalties under OCGA § 33-4-6 fails as a matter of law. For the reasons set forth infra, we affirm in part and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bimco Iron & Metal Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1971
- Hurst v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Bayrock Mortgage Corp. v. Chicago Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Schwartz v. Harris Waste Management Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- American Safety Indemnity Company v. Sto Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Ronald Lee v. Mercury Insurance Company of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Stanley v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Grange Mutual Casualty Company v. Boris WoodardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Evanston Ins. Co. v. Xytex Tissue Servs., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2019
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.