Sperry Corp., Sperry New Holland Division v. Schaeffer
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Circuit Judge.
Sperry Corporation, Sperry New Holland Division was awarded a deficiency judgment against Stanley Schaeffer (Stanley) as a result of Stanley’s co-signing a retail installment contract. Stanley appeals; we affirm.
Stanley and Allen Schaeffer were partners in a farm operation. In September of 1980, they jointly purchased a Sperry New Holland TR 70 combine from Ritter-Walz, a Parkston implement dealer. Sperry Corporation iinlancfed the purchase. When they dissolved their partnership in early 1981, Stanley agreed that Allen would keep the combine. Stanley then attempted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Northwest Realty Company v. CollingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Richter v. Industrial Finance Co. Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Vermillion v. HugenerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Reitz v. Ampro Royalty TrustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Roper v. NoelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Mash v. CutlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Dahl v. SittnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Vreugdenhil v. First Bank of South Dakota, N.A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.