Legal Opinion

Mash v. Cutler

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1992No. 17604, 17609PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Justice.

Dale and Dan Cutler (Dale and Dan respectively) appeal from the trial court’s judgment awarding Nathan Mash (Mash) $49,429.39 plus prejudgment interest and costs for breach of contract. Mash also appeals the trial court’s award of damages. We affirm.

Dale and Dan are father and son who make their living in the cattle business. They occasionally purchase and raise cattle for others. Dale runs a feedlot. Dan runs a ranch for the pasturing of cattle. Mash is a successful businessman who, in the middle 1980’s, became interested in raising cattle.

Mash entered into an oral agreement…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State of Iowa v. Damion John SeatsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  4. Denison State Bank v. MadeiraSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  5. Gross v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Landstrom v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. High Plains Genetics Research, Inc. v. J K Mill-Iron RanchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. SchillingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Parker v. Casa Del Rey-Rapid City, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API