Legal Opinion

Vreugdenhil v. First Bank of South Dakota, N.A.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1991No. 17005PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Justice.

Edwin and Loretta Vreugdenhil appeal from an order denying their claim for exemplary damages. We reverse and remand.

In 1972, Ed Vreugdenhil (Ed) purchased a one-half interest in Menning Implement Company (Menning) of Corsica, South Dakota. Ed and Sidney Hoekstra (Hoekstra), the owner of the remaining one-half interest, operated the business together until 1979 when Ed purchased Hoekstra’s interest in Menning. A portion of the down-payment for this purchase was financed by First Bank of South Dakota, N.A., (First Bank) Corsica, South Dakota.1 First Bank financed the operation…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Flockhart v. WyantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hannahs v. NoahSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. K & E Land and Cattle, Inc. v. MayerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gaylon Hofer v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  2. Isaac v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Kjerstad v. Ravellette Publications, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Schaffer v. Edward D. Jones & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Case v. MurdockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API