Legal Opinion

Dahl v. Sittner

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1988No. 16018PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Chief Justice.

Dewey and LaVonne Dahl (Dahls) appeal an order granting summary judgment in favor of Peter Sittner (Sittner) in an action charging Sittner with fraud and misrepresentation and breach of fiduciary duty regarding the sale of the Dahls’ ranch. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

On July 25, 1979, the Dahls and Sittner signed a listing contract to sell the Dahls’ 1400 acre ranch in Ziebach County, South Dakota. The Dahls had been contemplating selling their ranch because Dewey’s back problems and pending back surgery placed serious doubt on his ability to continue…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  3. Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Groseth International, Inc. v. Tenneco, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Hamaker v. Kenwel-Jackson MacHine, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Dahl v. SittnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. American Prairie Construction Co. v. HoichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. Lamp v. First National Bank of GarretsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Bordeaux v. Shannon County SchoolsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. McKinney v. Pioneer Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API