Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Melendez v. O'CONNOR

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 2002No. C7-02-1722PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Petitioners Brian Melendez and Ruth Stein filed a petition under Minn.Stat. § 204B.44 (2002) alleging that respondents, the Hennepin County Auditor/Treasurer and the Hennepin County Elections Manager, were about to commit an error in the preparation of the ballot for legislative district 59B by including Jason Samu-els’ name for the office of state representative. Petitioners alleged that Samuels had not resided in district 59B for the six months immediately preceding the November 5, 2002 election as required by Minn. Const, art. TV, § 6. Because there were no relevant facts in…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aronovitch v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Gradjelick v. HanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Fetsch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Piepho v. BrunsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ross v. State Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Liddy v. LamoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Bryan v. FawkesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  4. Inquiry into the Conduct of KarasovSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  5. Jackel v. BrowerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API