Legal Opinion
Jackel v. Brower
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 16, 2003No. C2-03-231PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge.
Respondents Dorthy and David Jackel sued appellant Jon W. Brower, Steele County, and Steele County’s planning director asserting numerous claims arising out of Brower’s construction of hog-confinement barns, including a claim that the facility built in 1996 violates the county’s setback requirements. Brower filed this interlocutory appeal from the district court’s issuance of an injunction compelling the county to enforce the setback requirement and compelling Brower to “permanently abate the violation” of the setback requirement. Because the district court abused…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Marriage of Gully v. GullySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Lowry v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peg Hutchison, Dan Johnson, Russ Nichols, Shawn Ripperger, Leigh Ann Swain, and Shelly Vander Tuig v. Douglas Shull, Steve Wilson, Dean Yordi, the Board of Supervisors for Warren County, Iowa, and Warren County, IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Toyota-Lift of Minnesota, Inc. v. American Warehouse Systems, LLC, and third party v. Les Nielsen, third partyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- All Finish Concrete, Inc. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Williams v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Jackel v. BrowerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.