Legal Opinion
Liddy v. Lamone
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 29, 2007No. 71, September Term, 2006PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, C.J.
This is the second of two cases involving the eligibility requirements of a candidate for the office of the Attorney General of Maryland. In Abrams v. Lamone, 398 Md. 146, 919 A.2d 1223 (2007), this Court considered a petition by Stephen A. Abrams (“Abrams”) 1 challenging the eligibility of Thomas E. Perez (“Perez”) to hold the office of the Attorney General. In Abrams, a case of first impression for this Court, this Court was required to interpret Article V, Section 4 of the Maryland Constitution, which provides:
“No person shall be eligible to the office of Attorney-General, who is not a…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Eu v. San Francisco County Democratic Central CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Purcell v. GonzalezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State Center, LLC v. Lexington Charles Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Bryan v. FawkesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Jones v. RosenbergCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Schade v. Maryland State Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.