Legal Opinion

Gradjelick v. Hance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 2002No. C4-00-2161PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.

Appellants Ted and Niki Gradjelick brought a negligence action against respondents Leland and Patricia Hance and respondent Connie Jo Klosterman for injuries arising out of an apartment building fire. The Gradjelicks’ suit is based on the Hances’ alleged knowledge of building and fire code violations and unsafe conditions. The Hances brought a motion for summary judgment, arguing that they had no actual or constructive knowledge of any fire code violations. The district court granted the Hances’ motion and dismissed the Gradjelicks’ action on the grounds that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage BankingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Molloy v. MeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. Anderson v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. Johnson v. Paynesville Farmers Union Cooperative Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Kapps v. Biosense Webster, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API