Piepho v. Bruns
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Petitioner Mark Piepho filed a petition under Minn.Stat. § 204B.44 (2000) alleging a wrongful act or omission by the respondent county auditors in their placement of candidate John Hottinger’s name on the ballot for the 2002 election. The petition was referred to a referee to take and receive evidence and make findings of fact ■ relative to petitioner’s claim that the candidate will not have resided in Legislative District 23 for six months immediately preceding the general election as required by Minn. Const, art. IV, § 6. The referee found that Hottinger established residency in…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Aronovitch v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Peterson v. StaffordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Fetsch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Bell v. GannawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Moe v. AlsopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- Inquiry into the Conduct of KarasovSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Lundquist v. LeonardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Melendez v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Olson v. ZEUHLKESupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Studer v. KiffmeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.