Legal Opinion
14859 Moorpark Homeowner's Assn. v. Vrt Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 1998No. Docket Nos. B110791, B110799PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.
These consolidated appeals involve the purported conveyance of a condominium complex, including the common areas, to a third party developer without obtaining a judicial partition pursuant to Civil Code section 1359. The matter comes to us to review the granting of a preliminary injunction to restrain the holder of the deeds of trust which encumber the individual units from foreclosing, and the denial of a preliminary injunction to restrain the third party developer from performing purported prophylactic demolition on the complex. We conclude that compliance with…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
- San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Nelson v. Avondale Homeowners Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- American Indian Model Schools v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Thaler v. Household Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Moorpark Homeowners Assn. v. Vrt Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Acqua Vista Homeowners Assn. v. MWI, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.