Hurtado v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
In this proceeding, petitioner Manuel Cid Hurtado seeks a writ of mandate directing respondent superior court to vacate its ruling that the applicable measure of damages in the underlying action for wrongful death .was that prescribed by California law without any maximum limitation, rather than that prescribed by the law of Mexico which limits the amount of recovery. We have concluded that the trial court correctly chose the law of California. We deny the writ.
Real parties in interest, the widow and children of Antonio Hurtado (hereafter plaintiffs) commenced against…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by289 opinions
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Paulsen v. CNF INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Virginia J. Barry Melville v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
284 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.