Legal Opinion
Har-Ned Lumber Co. v. Amagineers, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 14, 1989No. C6-88-1641PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
The trial court determined that service of a mechanics’ lien statement by certified mail pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 514.08, subd. 1(2) (Supp.1983) was accomplished upon the owner of the improved property. We affirm.
FACTS
David Gepner (Gepner) appeals the trial court’s conclusion that Har-Ned Lumber Company (Har-Ned) is entitled to foreclose a mechanics’ lien upon Gepner’s improved property. The facts are not at issue on appeal. Gepner owns a house in Hennepin County and has resided there with his wife and family for the last ten years. In 1983, Gepner contracted with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McIntee v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Goldsworthy v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Hoff v. Northwestern Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Enviro-Fab, Inc. v. Blandin Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Huynh v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Eischen Cabinet Co. v. HildebrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Monster Heavy Haulers, LLC v. Goliath Energy Services, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Rouse Mechanical, Inc. v. DahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Pella Products, Inc. v. Arvig Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Carolina Holdings Midwest, LLC v. CopoulsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.