Legal Opinion

Hoff v. Northwestern Elevator Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 3, 1913No. Nos. 17,927—(221)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Grant county, Elaherty J., denying its motion to vacate a judgment entered in the action and discharging an order to show canse why the writ of execution should not be quashed and the levy made by the sheriff of that county under the writ be discharged.

1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Grant county denying a motion to set aside a judgment entered by default in favor of plaintiff.

The facts are these:

The action was commenced November 21, 1911, to recover $548 and interest for labor claimed to have been performed by plaintiff for defendant. December 11, 1911, defendant served its answer, a general denial with an additional defense. Plaintiff served a reply to this answer early in January, 1912, and the issues were then ready for trial. On May 18, 1912, plaintiff’s attorney made and filed an affidavit to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Van Aernam v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Har-Ned Lumber Co. v. Amagineers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Atwood v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. In re the Estate of BridghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Central Metropolitan Bank v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. In Re Estate of DevenneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API