Carolina Holdings Midwest, LLC v. Copouls
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Respondents, subcontractors, filed mechanics’ liens on appellants’ property. Appellants challenge the district court’s determinations that service of both pre-lien notices and lien statements was adequate, that Minn.Stat. § 514.03 (2000) does not limit the amounts of the liens, that respondents are entitled to a personal judgment against appellants for the amount of the liens not satisfied by the foreclosure sale, and that respondents are entitled to an order for attachment. Because we see no error of law in these determinations, we affirm.
FACTS
Appellants James and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Morton Buildings, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- E.C.I. Corp. v. G.G.C. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- MERLE'S CONST. CO., INC. v. BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Eischen Cabinet Co. v. HildebrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004