Legal Opinion

Arntz Contracting Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 17, 1996No. A064300PublishedCited by 81 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STRANKMAN, P. J.

A general contractor was terminated from a public works construction project by the property owner who complained of deficient workmanship, and the surety that had issued performance and labor and material bonds on the project took over the project and completed construction using substitute contractors. In a lawsuit between the original general contractor and the surety, the surety recovered most of its completion costs and assorted expenses under the parties’ indemnification agreements executed in connection with the bonds.

However, the contractor recovered against the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
  2. LiMandri v. JudkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. PSE Consulting, Inc. v. MercedeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. Lewis Jorge Construction Management, Inc. v. Pomona Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API