Legal Opinion
Red Ball Interior Demolition Corp. v. Palmadessa
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 17, 1995No. 94 Civ. 4158 (RWS)PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Daniel Palmadessa (“Daniel”), Donald Palmadessa (“Donald”), William Pal-madessa (“William”), Supreme Recycling, Inc. (“Supreme”) and Fortune Interior Dismantling Corporation (“Fortune”) have moved for dismissal of the complaint (the “Complaint”) of plaintiffs Red Ball Interior Demolition Corporation, a New York corporation (“Red Ball”) and John Palmadessa (“John”) pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) Fed. R.Civ.P. for failure to plead claims upon which relief can be granted and Rule 9(b) Fed.R.Civ.P. for failure to plead fraud with sufficient particularity.…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Granite Partners, LP v. Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Katzman v. Victoria's Secret CatalogueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Red Ball Interior Demolition Corp. v. PalmadessaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Citadel Management, Inc. v. Telesis Trust, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- In Re Blech Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.