Legal Opinion
Ambrosino v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 14, 1995No. C 94-00990 CWPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
WILKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Adjudication on his Second, Third and Fourth Causes of Action against Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company was heard by this Court on March 10, 1995. Having considered the papers filed by the parties and oral argument on the motion, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion in part and DENIES it in part, as follows.
Statement of Facts
Plaintiff Ambrosino, a doctor of podiatrie medicine, and Defendant Metropolitan, a corporation…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mx Group, Inc. v. City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Palm Medical Group, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Capitol West Appraisals, LLC v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2010
- MX Group, Inc. v. City of CovingtonDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2000
- Carnegie Center Assoc. v. RhettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.