Legal Opinion
Mx Group, Inc. v. City of Covington
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 12, 2002No. 00-6305PublishedCited by 150 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Defendants, the City of Covington, Kentucky, the Covington Board of Adjustment, Marc Tischbein, and the Covington Station Council of Co-Owners, Inc., appeal the judgment of the district court, after a bench trial, in favor of Plaintiff pursuant to claims brought under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12131, et seq., and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehabilitation Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. Plaintiff, MX Group, Inc., alleged that Defendants discriminated against it because of Plaintiffs association with its potential…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by150 opinions
- Lovell v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Chevron Phillips Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- A HELPING HAND, LLC v. Baltimore County, MDCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Addiction Specialists, Inc. v. The Township of Hampton, the Township of Hampton Council and the Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Audrey Jacques, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Dimarzio, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.