Legal Opinion

Palm Medical Group, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance Fund

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 2008No. A114651PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POLLAK, J.

Palm Medical Group, Inc. (Palm), an occupational medical clinic located in Fresno, was denied admission into the preferred provider network (PPN) operated by State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF), a California public enterprise fund operating throughout the state as a nonprofit workers’ compensation insurer. After a four-week trial, a jury found that SCIF had excluded Palm in violation of the common law fair procedure doctrine and awarded Palm damages of $1,131,000. The trial court subsequently granted SCIF’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the ground…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining & Milling Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Westlake Community Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of OrthodontistsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Falcone v. Middlesex County Medical SocietySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Kelly v. CB&I CONSTRUCTORS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Duchrow v. ForrestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Capitol West Appraisals, LLC v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2010
  5. Sound Appraisal v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API