Legal Opinion

Hotle v. Miller

California Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1959No. Sac. 6819PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Plaintiffs, executors of the will of Seymour Frizelle, appeal from a judgment for defendant, special administrator of the estate of Jennie Frizelle, in an action for reformation of a written agreement executed in January, 1953. The judgment was entered upon the sustaining of a general demurrer to the first amended complaint without leave to amend.

The complaint alleged:

On November 6, 1940, Seymour and Jennie opened an account with the Bank of Sonoma. The deposit agreement provided that “We hereby agree with each other and the bank, that all moneys now or hereafter deposited by us or either of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Paterson v. ComastriCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Auerbach v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Bailard v. MardenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. McKeon v. GiustoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lakeshore Commercial Finance Corp. v. DrobacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Abbey v. LordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Pruyn v. WatermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. 600 North Frederick Road, LLC v. Burlington Coat FactoryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Casa Colina Convalescent Home for Crippled Children, Inc. v. WiestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API