Legal Opinion

Paterson v. Comastri

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1952No. S. F. 18092PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff brought three separate actions, which were consolidated for trial,' to determine the conflicting claims of plaintiff and defendant Comastri to three joint bank accounts. One account is in each of the defendant banks, and it was stipulated that the banks are mere stakeholders. From findings and judgments adverse to her, plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff and Mary Blair Gilmour were sisters. Following the death of Mary’s husband in 1934, Mary opened a savings account in the names of herself and plaintiff with each of the defendant banks. In July, 1945, Mary married defendant Comastri, and in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Moskowitz v. MarrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Kennedy v. McMurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. In Re Estate of HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. MacHado v. MacHadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Machado v. MachadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Shurrum v. WattsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Propst v. StillmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Solon v. LichtensteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API