In Re Ole K. Nilssen
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NIES, Circuit Judge.
Ole K. Nilssen appeals from the final decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in which the board, pur suant to its authority under 37 C.F.R. § 1.196(b) (1987), rejected claims 1-4, 9-11, and 16 of Nilssen’s patent application Serial No. 476,150 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (1982 & Supp. IV 1986) as unpatentable for obviousness. We affirm.
Background
Nilssen describes the invention of the instant appeal as a “means by which the self-oscillating inverter in a power-line-operated inverter-type fluorescent lamp ballast is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- The Standard Oil Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. American Cyanamid Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- John H. Coleman v. Martin B. DinesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- In Re Howard SernakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- In re WoodCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Motorola, Inc. v. Interdigital Technology Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- In Re Bradley C. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Ziggity Systems, Inc. v. Val Watering SystemsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Vas-Cath Inc. v. MahurkarDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Ole K. Nilssen v. Motorola, Inc., and Motorola Lighting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.