Legal Opinion

Vas-Cath Inc. v. Mahurkar

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 27, 1990No. Civ. A. 88 C 4997PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. *

Sakharam D. Mahurkar, a physician, holds several patents on dual-lumen hemo-dialysis catheters. A dual-lumen catheter is a pair of tubes (lumens) designed to allow blood to be removed from an artery, processed in a machine that removes impurities, and returned close to the place of removal.

Hemodialysis catheters are used to palliate kidney failure. In the event of chronic failure, physicians construct a fistula, a permanent internal connection between vein and artery that provides ready, long-term access to the circulatory system. During the several weeks…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Martin v. WilksSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Mid-State Fertilizer Co., Lasley Kimmel, and Maxine Kimmel v. Exchange National Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vas-Cath Incorporated and Gambro, Inc. v. Sakharam D. Mahurkar, and Quinton Instruments CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. In Re Mahurkar Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Patent LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  3. Petit v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  4. In re Mahurkar Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Patent LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  5. Merck & Co., Inc. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USADistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API