Legal Opinion

Palm Beach Co. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 1995No. C-940298PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff-appellant, Palm Beach Company, brings this appeal from the order of the trial court granting summary judgment to the defendant-appellee, Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., in an action which centered on allegations that Dun & Bradstreet had deliberately deceived Palm Beach into purchasing more of its services than it needed. Palm Beach asserts three assignments of error, each challenging the propriety of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, we find none of the assignments of error to have merit, and thus affirm. We have sua sponte removed this case from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aultman Hospital Ass'n v. Community Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Investors REIT One v. JacobsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Ullmann v. MayOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Shover v. Cordis Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Andrianos v. Community Traction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Medical Mut. of Ohio v. K. AMALIA ENTERPRISES INC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Cundall v. U.S. BankOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Resource Title Agency, Inc. v. Morreale Real Estate Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
  4. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. MDL Active Duration Fund, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
  5. Drozeck v. Lawyers Title InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API