Legal Opinion
Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. MDL Active Duration Fund, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 29, 2007No. 205-CV-673PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GRAHAM, District Judge.
This is an action filed by the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, an agency of the state of Ohio, against the MDL Active Duration Fund, LTD. (“the Fund”), MDL Capital Management Inc. (“MDL Capital”), and Mark D. Lay. The complaint alleges violations of Ohio law, and jurisdic tion in this court is based on diversity of citizenship. Other defendants named in the complaint were previously dismissed from this action due to lack of personal jurisdiction in an opinion and order filed on June 1, 2006.
This matter is before the court on the motion of the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Alan Weiner, D.P.M. v. Klais and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kuvedina, LLC v. Cognizant Technology SolutionsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- In Re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
- Krukrubo v. Fifth Third Bank, 07ap-270 (12-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Buckeye Retirement Co. v. Kakde (In Re Kakde)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- In Re Enron Corporation Securities, DerivativeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.