Investors REIT One v. Jacobs
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohn V. Corrigan, J.
The issue presented for our consideration by the appellant-trusts, IRO and IRT, queries whether the discovery rule is available to extend the governing statute of limitations on the claims of IRO and IRT against the accountant-defendants for negligence. The “discovery rule” generally provides that a cause of action accrues for purposes of the governing statute of limitations at the time when the plaintiff discovers or, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have discovered the complained of injury. See Oliver v. Kaiser Community Health Found. (1983), 5 Ohio St. 3d 111, 5 OBR 247, 449 N.E.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- O'Stricker v. Jim Walter Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Zimmie v. Calfee, Halter & GriswoldOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Oliver v. Kaiser Community Health FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Frysinger v. LeechOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Hershberger v. Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by160 opinions
- Regis Lutz v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Wyser-Pratte Management Co., Inc. v. Telxon Corporation, Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Natl. Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v. WuerthOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Zemcik v. LaPine Truck Sales & Equipment Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re TaubmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.