Legal Opinion
Orsini v. Tarro
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 25, 2003No. AC 23531PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The defendant, Kathleen Tarro, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the application for a prejudgment remedy filed by the plaintiff, John Orsini, in the amount of $5500. The defendant claims that the court improperly granted the prejudgment remedy on the basis of General Statutes § 52-568. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to our consideration of the defendant’s claim on appeal. The defendant is the principal of Interiors of Yesterday, LLC (Interiors). The plaintiff was Interiors’ landlord. In April, 2001, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richard Gonzales, Juliana Gonzales and Michael Dodge v. Barbara Parks and Jerome ParksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Vandersluis v. WeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Greenberg, Rhein & Margolis, Inc. v. Norris-Faye Horton Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. HamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Connecticut Light and Power Co. v. GilmoreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. DunicanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Scheer v. DiBenedettoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Northeast Builders Supply & Home Centers, LLC v. RMM Consulting, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.