Legal Opinion
Griggs v. Nash
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided May 24, 1989No. 17637PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
This is an action against an attorney seeking indemnity or contribution based on an alleged breach of a fiduciary relationship and negligence. The primary issue presented is whether the two-year statute of limitations contained in I.C. § 5-219(4) had run before the action against the attorney was commenced. The trial court ruled that the statute had run. The trial court also awarded attorney fees to the attorney pursuant to I.C. § 12-120(3). We affirm both decisions of the trial court.
I
THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS.
Equity Mortgage Services, Inc. (EMSI) of Spokane,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Streib v. VeigelIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Muir v. Hadler Real Estate Management Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
- May Trucking Co. v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Chenery v. Agri-Lines Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
- Pearson v. ParsonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Bonz v. SudweeksIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- City of McCall v. BuxtonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Brooks v. Gigray Ranches, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
- Tingley v. HarrisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.