Legal Opinion

Streib v. Veigel

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1985No. 15487PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a summary judgment in favor of defendants in an action for malpractice by defendants, professional accountants who had prepared plaintiffs’ income tax returns. The trial court held that the cause of action accrued at the time defendants prepared the income tax forms, that plaintiffs had not initiated the action within the applicable two-year statute of limitations, and that therefore the action was barred. We reverse.

The truth of the alleged facts, of course, remains for ascertainment at trial. However, at the point of summary judgment,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Stephens v. StearnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Billings v. Sisters of Mercy of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Blake v. CruzIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Denney v. Deutsche Bank AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Khan v. BDO Seidman, LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  4. International Engine Parts, Inc. v. Feddersen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
  5. McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API