Chenery v. Agri-Lines Corp.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment and orders denying a motion for a new trial, and a cross-appeal from orders denying pre-judgment interest, costs, and attorney fees. We affirm.
In brief, Layne Pump manufactured, sold and installed a deep-well turbine irrigation pump on property owned by Chenery and leased by the Spencers. Six years later Agri-Lines was employed by the Spencers to repair the pump. In the repair process a portion of the pump fractured, causing much of the mechanism to drop to the bottom of the well.
Chenery and the Spencers brought action against…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Anderson v. EthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- C. E. Bradshaw, Sr. v. Vic ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State, Department of Human Services Ex Rel. Palmer v. Unisys Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Sherwood v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Spence v. HowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
- Griggs v. NashIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Watson v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.