Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Parsons

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1988No. 16904PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a medical malpractice case arising out of the death of a two and one-half year-old child in which the trial court granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The primary issue presented is whether in order to establish medical malpractice against a board-certified specialist plaintiff is required to present expert testimony from another physician who is board-certified in the same specialty. We conclude that plaintiff is not required to do so, if the expert testimony presented by plaintiff complies with the requirements contained in I.C. §§ 6-1012 and 6-1013.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. EthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Doe v. DurtschiIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Buck v. St. ClairIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Ashby v. HubbardIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Maxwell v. Women's Clinic, P.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Hecla Mining Co. v. Star-Morning Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Rhodehouse v. StuttsIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Griggs v. NashIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Gilman v. ChoiWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Dekker v. Magic Valley Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1988

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API