Legal Opinion

Bonz v. Sudweeks

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1991No. 18335PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYLE, Justice.

In this appeal we are called upon to determine whether the existence of a cloud on the title to real property which contin ued because of a failure to properly record a release of lis pendens is sufficient damage for a professional malpractice action to accrue.

The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed plaintiffs’ case on the basis that the action had accrued at the time the cloud on title was allowed to remain and the two-year statute of limitations in I.C. § 5-219(4) had expired prior to plaintiffs filing their complaint. For reasons set…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Doe v. DurtschiIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Stephens v. StearnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Blake v. CruzIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Tusch Enterprises v. CoffinIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Streib v. VeigelIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Ricca v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Thomson v. Idaho Insurance Agency, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hines v. HinesIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API