Legal Opinion
Monroe v. International Union UAW
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 11, 1982No. C-3-79-288PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY ON PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; MOTION SUSTAINED; DEFENDANT UNIONS DISMISSED AS PARTIES DEFENDANT
RICE, District Judge.
The Plaintiff in this action, Charles Monroe, brought suit under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185, alleging that Defendants had breached their duty of fair representation and had violated the collective bargaining agreement. Three Defendants were named in the Complaint: International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), its Local 696, and Plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- National Labor Relations Board v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Clayton v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Charles Monroe v. International Union, UawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Haupt v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
- Grant v. ARA Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
- Nanney v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
- Reinhardt v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.