Legal Opinion

Reinhardt v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 17, 1986No. 85-CV-10490-BCPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHURCHILL, District Judge.

This is an action brought under section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act. 29 U.S.C. § 185. The named defendants are United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers, (hereinafter U.A.W.) international union, local 526 in Bay City, Michigan, local 2571 in Niagara Falls, New York and the Allied Corporation. The eight plaintiffs are former hourly employees of Allied and U.A.W. members. They seek damages and/or reinstatement at full seniority with Allied.

All eight plaintiffs formerly worked in Allied’s Bay City plant and were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clayton v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In Re Ben CarterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Ruzicka v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  4. Charles Monroe v. International Union, UawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. Banque De Depots v. National Bank of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re TurnerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
  2. In Re US Truck Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
  3. LaPointe v. United Autoworkers Local 600District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
  4. Solomon v. Riverview Finance Co. (In re Kitchen Fare Food Service, Inc.)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
  5. Hocker v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API