Perkins v. Wakeham
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
— The appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial, so far as it affects the respondent town of Santa Ana, must be dismissed.
The ■ notice of intention to move for a new trial was *581not served on said respondent. There was an attempt to serve the statement, but the attorney upon whom it was served had no authority to accept service, which fact was known to appellant at the time of service.
The motion of respondent the town of Santa Ana to dismiss the appeal from the order denying a new trial is granted, and said appeal, in so far as it affects said respondent, is dismissed. A motion…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Arndt v. GriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
3Cited by16 opinions
- Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Hook v. HoffmanArizona Supreme Court · 1915
- Lantry v. ParkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Park v. PowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.