Hook v. Hoffman
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Cochise. A. C. Lockwood, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtFranklin, J.
The defendant in this action is a resident of the state of Ohio. He was served by registered mail, and also had actual notice by being served personally in that state with a copy of the summons and complaint herein. The defendant appeared specially under the statute for the purpose of objecting to the jurisdiction. The ground of objection being that in this kind of action the court could acquire no jurisdiction of the person of defendant by this mode of service, such service not being due process of law, within the meaning of the Constitution of Arizona and the Constitution of the United…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Arndt v. GriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Jellenik v. Huron Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Hart v. SansomSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Pomona MacHinery Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Bouree v. Trust Francais des Actions de la Franco-Wyoming Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1924
- Ruby v. United Sugar Companies, S. A.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
- D. W. Onan & Sons, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Abbott v. WagnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.